Itching Ears
When I was in college, I witnessed a couple of the most knowledgeable and loving men I have ever known (Bible professors) as they publicly disagreed on certain doctrinal issues. In spite of their differences, they were respectful and loving toward one another. I heard each of them, in a public forum in the presence of the other, good-naturedly say, “I don’t see how such and intelligent man can be so misinformed on such a clear issue.” And each of them took the jab in the loving spirit in which it was given. They were role models of unity in diversity as long as they lived.
Because of the nature and ramifications of biblical interpretations, it is most difficult for the more conservative members to accept the more progressive members. (Even those more conservative members are rejected by those who are even more conservative than them.) To the conservative way of thinking, accepting progressives is condoning error and error should not be condoned.
To the conservative, progressives don’t interpret the scriptures strictly and correctly. Instead, they “want their ears tickled”. Conservatives believe that progressives disregard scriptures rather than apply them. Without specifically saying so, the impression left is that the more regulated you are in your interpretation, the more accurate you are in your interpretation. Conversely, the less regulated you are, the less accurate you are. But I believe this is flawed thinking.
If Jesus taught that you should not be strictly regulated, wouldn’t the most accurate interpretation of scripture coincide with that same teaching? In Matthew 15:9 (KJV), Jesus said, “But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” I can assure you that these men of which Jesus speaks, thought they were accurately teaching the words of God because they were even counting out their spices to give a tenth to the Lord.
Throughout the New Testament, well meaning Pharisees who were strictly interpreting the law felt like those who were not enforcing the strict laws were in error. But in actuality, it was they, the “strict” interpretationists who were in error. Interpreting too “strictly” is just as bad as interpreting too “loosely”. Neither is acceptable if it is done intentionally.
So it behooves us, I believe, that we focus like a laser, whether conservative or progressive, on God’s word and what he is trying to tell us in that word. It also behooves us, I believe, in light of the fact that we are just human and that we do make mistakes, that we allow some latitude---a “margin of error” in our brethren. Because they disagree with us is not good reason, in and of itself, for us to assign improper motives or ignorance or slothfulness or rebellion or error to them.
I hope we can have great discussions on biblical issues in the year ahead. I hope we can disagree agreeably. I hope we can each, with open minds, have our knowledge and understanding of the scriptures expanded. And finally, I hope we can do it in love.
God Bless. Dennis












Recent Comments
This is Dave Berkey.
Have you Facil
Well said Annie. Amen!
When I